Ontic Pancomputational Theism

 ...MOA...John konnor... 1) it is necessarily possible that God exists 2) if it is necessarily not the case that God exists then it is possible necessary that God does not exist C) God exists Let: G!= God exists 1)□◇G!                         P. 2)□~G!⊃◇□~G!          P. 3)~G!                             AIP 4)□~G!                         3 NI 5)◇□~G!                      2,4 MMP 6)◇~◇~~G!                 5 ME 7)◇~◇G!                       6 DN 8)~◇~◇G!                    1 ME 9)◇~◇G!∧~◇~◇G!     7,8 Conj. 10)G!      ...

 .... ontological argument from pancomputational universe/ roundsquare copula... john konnor... 1) for all x if x exists only in the mind then x's nature does not encode existence 2) if God does not exist only in the mind then God exists in reality C) God exists M!x: x exists only in the mind. exE!: x's nature encodes existence R!x: x exists in reality g=(ix)exE! 1. (∀x) M!x⊃~exE! 2. ~M!g⊃R!g 3. M!g.   (AiP) 4. Mg⊃~egE! (1UI) 5. ~egE!       (3,4 MP) 6.(∃x)[(exE!∧(∀y)eyE!.⊃    (x=y))∧~exE!]    theory of descriptions 7. (EaE!∧(∀y)eyE!⊃    (x=y))∧~eaE!  6 EI 8. ((∀y)eyE!⊃(a=y)∧eaE)∧~eaE! 7 commutation 9.((∀y)eyE!.⊃(a=y))∧(eaE!∧~eaE!) 8 association 10.(eaE!∧~eaE!) 9 simplification 11.~M!g (3-10 indirect proof) 12. R!g   (2,11 MP) Brief defense: Since the computational universe is a thick abstract tegmarkian math object which can be modeled in phase space, it follows something must be pure concrete existence by n...